Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread :

Help to track HD footage with zoom etc

 
n°1316
vincefx
Posted on 12-20-2006 at 11:52:51 AM  profilanswer
 

Hello all.
I have already done some track on simple shoot, but now im trying with a more complicate shoot, in HD.
Its a hand shoot with some zoom and panoramique, on some building.
I have no idea of the focal.
When I solve for exemple between frame 0-50 its ok, then if I do 0-51 everything is different, sometimes better, sometimes all my blue cone are gone...That makes two weeks Im trying to solve this shoot... Ive learned how to tell him when the focal is fixe or not. Ive put some 3d coordonnées on some track. And sometimes I feel that more a give information and more my solve is wrong....
Ive a shoot from an another angle, so I thought it can help me to solve, but its worst...:(
Besides, for some track, I give survey information and when I solve, some axis are different...sometimes very diferent..
That makes 3weeks im trying to have a good solve..... please help??????? :cry:  
If i post my mm project can someone help me to tracking shoot like this? But the video is very big, if put a lower resolution is it ok or is it breaking all my mm project?
 
Thx very much
 
I hope you understand my english :pt1cable:


Message edited by vincefx on 12-20-2006 at 05:20:04 PM
n°1317
timefx
Posted on 12-26-2006 at 11:55:34 PM  profilanswer
 

Hi Vince,
can you put *.jpg (+/- 500k/frame) on a ftp for download?
Best regards
Tim

n°1318
vincefx
Posted on 12-27-2006 at 10:15:09 AM  profilanswer
 

Hi TimeFX
This is my project, the video en jpg, my matchmover project and a preview from 3dsmax to my new results of the tracking. I think now I can correcte, all the "jump" in max, but I would be happy to be able to have a good track directly in matchmover. To improve my knowledge.
Thx if you have some advice:)
 
http://vince.fx.free.fr/forumfiles [...] aute01.rar

n°1319
timefx
Posted on 12-27-2006 at 11:44:51 PM  profilanswer
 

Hi Vince,
"c'est pas de la tarte comme on dit chez nous!" :-) Je regarde ça et te recontacte...
Cordialement
Tim

n°1320
vincefx
Posted on 12-27-2006 at 11:50:32 PM  profilanswer
 

thx, are you french? if yes can we speak french?:) are you from the realviz's team?

n°1321
timefx
Posted on 12-28-2006 at 11:41:23 AM  profilanswer
 

Allemand de naissance, mais je vis depuis 17 ans en France! :-) Non, je ne suis pas de REALVIZ, je suis movematcher freelance, mais j'ai fait récemment "demo-artist" pour MMPro et Movimento en Allemagne pour eux...

n°1322
vincefx
Posted on 12-28-2006 at 11:46:38 AM  profilanswer
 

cest cool ca, movimento a lair tres interessant aussi. mais deja matchmover, ca minteresse beaucoup de le maitriser. pour linstant jnai tracké que des petits plans pour mamuser comme par exemple celui la ds mon jardin:
http://site.voila.fr/belong/ForumF [...] ivee04.wmv

n°1323
timefx
Posted on 12-28-2006 at 12:00:50 PM  profilanswer
 

As-tu des infos supplémentaires concernant le plan HD?:
Quelle caméra (fabriquant, type)? HDV?!? FilmBackWidth? PixelAspectRatio? et tout autre élémént...
tim@movematchers.net

n°1324
vincefx
Posted on 12-28-2006 at 12:04:44 PM  profilanswer
 

nan justement...jsais que cest une sony Z1, tourné en HD.
1920/1080 pixel carré. jnai pastrouvé pour le filmbackwidth.
je tenvoi un mail. mem si jpense pas avoir dautres elements...

n°1325
timefx
Posted on 12-28-2006 at 06:34:29 PM  profilanswer
 

SONY Z1:
FilmBackWidth: 7.3787mm (1/3" )
Focale: du 4.5mm au 54mm
Bonnes Fêtes! :-)

n°1326
vincefx
Posted on 12-28-2006 at 09:09:20 PM  profilanswer
 

ok merci, bonnes fetes a bientot;)

n°1378
CChris
Posted on 02-20-2007 at 10:29:24 AM  profilanswer
 

hi guys,
 
just an question about the film back of the sony z1.
im using the sony hvr z1e for my tests and i found a film back of 6mm width and 4,5mm height somewhere in the internet.
from where do you have the information for the film back?

n°1379
timefx
Posted on 02-24-2007 at 03:22:51 PM  profilanswer
 

Hi Chris,
it's a mathematical value for a 1/3 inch chip with a 16/9 aspect ratio.
It seems to be a very close estimation, since it gives acurat results. The exposed chip-size should be slightly smaller though...
Best regards
Tim


Go to:
Add a reply